Privileges for Inmates

Others believe that the prison formation cannot reconstruct (Kroll, 1984, p. 23). This view is supported by research demo which has accumulated and shows that "very few of the correctional programs were having any appreciable impact upon rates of recidivism or on the ever change magnitude volume of crime" (Ohlin, 1973, p. 7). Therefore, it can be argued that by and large, prisons give birth had little success in rehabilitating or changing vile way. Thus, it seems that the American prison system has, at least so far, worked better as an instauration which vindicatees bad behavior than an institution which reforms and restores criminals or turns them into law abiding citizens who stop committing crimes.

In addition, some(a) researchers and scholars have adopted the point of view that even if prisons could rehabilitate inmates, that the purpose of our prisons system is not to rehabilitate but to punish people who have committed crimes. The position that prisons were built and should be maintained solely for the purpose of punishing criminals, is supported by the fact that they were "originally constructed as a humane substitute(a) to the public floggings and executions that were originally used to punish criminals" (Murphy, 1984, p. 29). The idea that prisons should

The idea that inmates should be allowed special privileges, such(prenominal) as weightlifting, is in direct opposition to the concept that prisons were built to punish criminals. The idea that prisons were built to punish criminals, and not to rehabilitate them, is supported by a study done by Francis T. Murphy. Mr. Murphy contends that the most desirable penal policy is that of just punishment. Just punishment, according to Murphy, is the "swift punishment of blameworthy behavior" (Murphy, 1984, pp. 29-30). This scholar believes that when a person is sentenced to prison, the judge has spoken some the seriousness of that person's criminal behavior, and society has spoken about how it wishes to smokestack with that behavior. The prison system was constructed as an alternative to hanging and former(a) types of capital punishment.

Prisons are places for punishment, and when prisons concentrate on punishing criminals so as to discourage other(a)s from committing crimes, prisons serve the goal for which they were intended. In other words, the goal of the prison system is to deter people from committing crimes by showing that prisons will be severely and harshly penalize instead of providing interesting things for inmates to do, such as lift weights (thereby ameliorate the appearance of the prisoners bodies and increasing their sense of vitality and well being).

U.S. ecumenic Accounting Office (1996). Federal and States Prisons: Inmate Populations, Costs and prominence Models. Washington D.C.: General Government Division.

Leone, B. (1997). America's Prisons: Opposing Viewpoints. San Diego: Greenhaven P.

Another writer who has studied the subject of crime and punishment, Graeme R. Newman, who also teaches criminology, believes that prisons should be damned workhouses in which criminals are taught the meaning of suffering. Newman suggests that many penalists have bemused sight of the important function of retribution. He believes that although murderers cannot bring back
Ordercustompaper.com is a professional essay writing service at which you can buy essays on any topics and disciplines! All custom essays are written by professional writers!