Running Head : Legal AnalysisNameUniversityCourseTutorDateSorphia vs . Robert , Chapter 9 6Legal Issue : Did Robert s  teleph ane number of compensating himself breach the oral  subscribe that had been  beard with AlphonsRule of Law :  verbal agreements  are as  nice as written ones and should be respected to the letterAnalysis : Robert had taken care of Alphons at a  succession that the  subsequently was ailing . Though the agreement that the former should  utterly be compensated for the services and goodwill offered , the appointed lawyers                                                                                                                                                         are obliged to ensure that it is followed to the letter . He appointing of Roberts father , who happens to be Alphon s Cousin as attorney is testament to the trust that the later had on his family members .  of the family member disputes the fact that Robert was indeed important in the later days of Alphonso s life . Neither is it in  arguing that the two parties had entered into oral agreement of having Robers be compensated for his good deeds . The  alone contention , as expressed by Sophia , involves the amount by which Roberts is being compensated . Both parties did not agree on the amount of compensation that should be awarded to Roberts . Since  there have been contentions on the awards provided to Robert , it is up to the attorney and other interests to agree on what was to be the appropriate compensation Roberts was not  component Alphon s so as to be paid for the services it was  totally from his good will . This scenario shows that Roberts acted ethically and in accordance with the contract that was morally  concur by both partiesConclusion : Since it is commonly agreed that there existed an agreement between Roberts and Alphons , the parties involved should agree on the amount of compensationEthical Case . Chapter 10 6Legal Issue : Does entering into contractual agreements without attorney approval lead to invalidity of the contractRule of Law :  produce is entered when two parties provide their consent .
      Analysis : McKenna and metalworker entered into a  fertilization contract once their signatures were embedded on the duly provided documents  all the same the required attorney approval . However , the legal  wording used in contract agreements such as the one McKenna and metalworker signed meant that the later had little understanding of what was contained conditionalities contained  therein . This meant that Smith could only enter into the contract successfully when his attorney was present failure of which led to the reviewing of the contract . This situation could be escaped by drafting contractual terms and agreements in clear and concise English that would be understood by stakeholders to understand . Lack of clear understanding and unavailability of Smith s attorney is what led to review of the contract , much to the  harm of the purchasing party . Had the s be written in ways that would that would be understood by all parties , Smith and Drew would have worked their way out easily . The only consideration would involve the amount offered in purchase of the  plus . The existence...If you want to get a full essay, order it on our website: 
Ordercustompaper.comIf you want to get a full essay, wisit our page: 
write my paper   
 
No comments:
Post a Comment