Tenneesee

Excessive Force Instructor / Course stool /InstitutionExcessive ForceDeadly ForceEdit Name Here3 /13 /2009 Discussion regarding excessive suck up , deadly force , and related S .S Court decisions Excessive ForceThe Tennessee v . assemble model (1985 , regarding the spend of deadly force was notable for a couple of important reasons . First because it brought out into the open the place of excessive and /or deadly force by the law . The other reason it was important is because of the ruling , which basically ban the indiscriminate use of deadly force (Text . 198 . The laws were much more(prenominal) clearly defined , and laid out in dispirited and white what was and was not allowed , what was considered reasonable . The ruling in the Tennessee v .

Garner case , besides defining these limits on the use of deadly force , effectively put an end to any(prenominal) local police policy that allowed officers to shoot unarmed or otherwise nondangerous offenders if they resisted arrest or attempted to flee from police custody (Text .198 . Another development since the Tennessee v . Garner case (1985 ) is that we have seen the court system award punitive distress settlements in cases of excessive police force For example redress were awarded in Larez v . Los Angeles , 946 F2d 630 (9th Cir . 1991 (Warren . 2004 .475 , and who can for die perhaps the most(prenominal) famous , Rodney exponent , of the King v . Marci Case , 993 F2d 294 (2nd Cir .1993 (Warren .2004 .475 . King s lawyer s closing statement regarding why he matt-up the award of punitive damages in the case...If you want to get a full essay, order it on our website: Ordercustompaper.com

If you want to get a full essay, wisit our page: write my paper