Metaphors of power and destruction contribute to Orwells comprehension of irrevocable submission. Orwell begins to fall upon the damage the elephant has inflicted on the Burmese people and their homes; how they have no means to protect themselves and are helpless against it (¶ 3). Orwell is signifying the similarity amidst the detrimental elephant and the imperialistic force of Britain. More comparisons follow as Orwell picks up a gun and follows the elephant becoming the conjurer with the magic rifle (¶ 7). With the gun to shoot the elephant, Orwell becomes the most powerful someone in the village and the Burmese submit to this power, begging to him to put to work the business, even though, before the dilemma with the elephant, they ignored him.
Passive voice further explains the original power Orwell lacks over the Burmese. Before the elephant problem arises, Orwell describes how he [is] hated (¶ 1) by the Burmese population because he is a British officer.
Ironically, when the elephant begins to terrorize the village, the Burmese turn to Orwell because he is the only one capable of fixing the dilemma. He speaks of creation the leader of the people in this situation, but in man [he] [is] only an absurd puppet pushed to and fro by the will of [the] xanthous faces (¶ 7). His agency is really just a façade of his submission to the Burmese.
Symbolism of Orwells gun and the dead Indian in any case promote the concept of his submission to the Burmese as a façade. Orwell takes out a small gun, hardly large tolerable to damage an elephant, but due to its powerful sound, he deems it reclaimable in terrorem (¶ 3). The gun symbolizes the brute force of the British and how execute is not a problem for them. Although Orwell carries this deadly weapon, he becalm acts...If you want to get a full essay, order it on our website: Ordercustompaper.com
If you want to get a full essay, wisit our page: write my paper
No comments:
Post a Comment