By Stephanie Coontz
In the essay The Radical Idea of Marrying for Love, Stephanie Coontz talks about the taradiddle of
marriage in different cultures and in different countries. For just about cultures marriage was done as a
necessity. Couples needed to tie just to reproduce to make sure their family history was continued.
in that location was no romance in marriage, in fact, it was discouraged in most cultures for couples to fall in
be intimate before getting married. consort to Coontz, For most of history it was inconceivable that people
would choose their mates on the basis of something as fragile and irrational as cognize and then focus all
their sexual, intimate, and alruistic desires on the resulting marriage. (pg. 378)
Many different cultures befuddle many different views on falling in love before marriage. Love was
even looked at as unfriendly with marriage. In ancient India, they thought it was disruptive to fall in
love before getting married, the Greeks thought lovesickness was a peculiarity of insanity, and in the
Middle Ages if you were in love you were looked at as deranged in the mind by the French.
In
chinaware if there was excessive love between a maintain and wife it was looked upon as a threat to the
solidarity of the extened family. A sons parents could really send his wife back to her parents if they
didnt approve of her behavior of feat habits, or if they felt threatened by the sons romantic
attachement to his wife.
married couple was looked upon beyond intamacy and love. It was considered unseemly to show too
much affection or love to your spouse. Or to love your spouse excessively was considered adulterous.
It was alike insisted upon that too much intamacy between a husband and wife weakened a believers
devotion to God. For many cultures, love is a desireable outcome for...If you want to get a full essay, grade it on our website: Ordercustompaper.com
If you want to get a full essay, wisit our page: write my paper
No comments:
Post a Comment