Death Penalty Should Be Abolished
About two years ago, Dolores Dee Gonzales, one of the staff members of Mission College, was killed by her boyfriend. Her body was cut into pieces. She left a two-year grey son alone in the world. Her demise has been a cuff to her relatives and people who have known her. They have been waiting for justice. It is gain ground that the murderer must be put in prison for the committed crime. However, other people might not be satisfied with this result; they might say, No, he must be sentenced to death because it is justice. Therefore, we have laws. Even though I am always opposed to crime, I do not judge that the death penalisation is one of the best ways to figure out a murderer to justice. In my opinion, death penalty is irreligious, unconstitutional, ineffectual to reduce violent crime, inhumane, and too expensive. Besides, we should consider cases in which guileless persons have been executed by mistakes or murderers redeem themselves for their crimes.
Capital punishment or the death penalty is an proceeding authorized by the government to prosecute a shepherds crook who was involved in violent crimes. Since the first European settlers arrived in America, the death penalty has been accepted to punish a smorgasbord of offenses.
The English Penal Code listed fourteen capital offenses such(prenominal) as idolatry, blasphemy, rape, kidnapping, murder, assault in sudden anger (Baird, punishment and the Death Penalty, 103) There are five types of implementation: hanging, electronic chair, firing squad, poisoning gas, and lethal injection. The first recorded execution in the US was performed in Virginia in 1608. In 1845, the American for the Abolition of Capital Punishment was established. In 1846, the death penalty method was replaced with life imprisonment. (Baird, 104)
It does not bet for...
If you want to get a full essay, wisit our page: write my paper
No comments:
Post a Comment