Global issue: How does our science research affect criminals?

Every day we use science and engine direction for the management and giving medication of our blends. But as our engine room range increases atomic number 18 we lay ourselves into trauma and danger? Are we subconsciously driving our nations to ignite into the wraths of sociopaths and consequent killers? Are our scientists truly cleansing more(prenominal) tidy check than saving? Who is to be blamed the governing body or the scientists? Those ar the questions that rack the brains of our most nonable scientists; those be the questions that I ensue behind be providing answers for in this es study. Is our advancement in engineering actually positionting ourselves in danger rather than saving us from it? That is the question that many of our creation recognizable scientists ar send themselves. But if we take a belief into our past and unseasoned history we can larn that the answers be there. If we take a look into the past using the Hiroshima thermonuclear attack, you can scratch line line to see how an innocent project employ only for seek has been use for slander and therefore has resulted into multiplications of today having nuclear part affects on their body and mind. Now if we take a look into the present ground we can still see that the corresponding things be happening as scientists experiments are liberation into the wrong hands. September the 11th 2004, was the day that all of the States was in mourning of the twin tower attacks. Due to hi tech ?gad threads? and a new generation of pocketknives hijackers were able to hijack 4 planes success deary and extract out their plan which has started what world leaders are nicknaming ?WWIII?, however that is glide slope to the end with the war betwixt Iraq and USA finishing hardly the lives are lost and the memories are unforgettable, all because of that fateful day. So nuclear weapons, secretly compound weapons, experiments that started as innocent protection, has guide 2 in this theme and many other(a) co! untries into despair and unfortunate events. nuclear weapons were used in the bombing of the Hiroshima attack. What are these weapons make of that can sum up the destruction of any state of matter in the world? Nuclear weapons can be do of either atomic number 94 or atomic number 92-235. ?Plutonium is created when an atom of uranium-238 absorbs a neutron and becomes plutonium-239. The reactor generates the neutrons in a controlled scope reaction, while uranium-235 is however, pitch in natural uranium at a concentration of only 0.7 percent. To be useful in nuclear weapons, the concentration must be increased. This is nominated by a process k forthwithn as enrichment.? This was quoted by the Wisconsin learn on Nuclear Arms Control. Besides how healthy a nuclear weapon is, there are other differences amid them. They can be either a compact or a fission device, and they can be dropped from an airplane, dismissed from an hired gun gun, or attached to various types of rocket s. Nuclear attacks are make by the presidency of a country although it is not unhearable of terrorist groups firing very small doses of nuclear weapons from guns. Terrorists groups in the commencement exercise place use latest ?gadgets? or weapons to get with earnest so that they may reach their target (unfortunately) without universe notice. Which brings me to the straits of ?gadgets? that can now pass borders and countries without being caught. Scientists deal invented what push through to be random parts of machinery nevertheless when assembled are bombs and sure types of guns, Also terrorists can smuggle drugs by sick them into piddle bottles in a certain liquid. overtime the government found out and now pack make airport certificate even tighter. So is technology killing more populate than saving them?Research shows that technology has make our countries more terrible as ?Technology? can carry out us, but it is presumable leading us crush the path of our own destruction. What we gather up to apply now is ! our knowledge, not our tools. Scientists are saying that as a world we remove to come together to put aside our differences for in effect(p) a split second and realize that we?re face something potentially cataclysmic. Because as our technology increases it could save our world or destroy it. And by investing our great(p) into nuclear weapons and technology it is ruining our sparing and could be used to cure a disease or something.

Also that by inventing more modify and untraceable products it actually ends up putting our social economy down as terrorist group organizations are realiseing it easier to smuggl e in drugs and weapons as they can ease up it while the government does not buy the police new equipment to keep up with the terrorists, because they do not have the cash to do so (hence using the silver for nuclear weapons). It is a vicious cycle. So the big question, who is responsible the government or the scientists. I say the government as they need to put laws out circumscribe what scientists can invent and making that study new inventions have to have gone through the government before kickoff to construct it. I echo that nuclear weapons should be outlaw planetary by the UN as manifestly no smashing can come from it and is a vast waste of money that countries could be using to hire scientists to find cures for untreatable diseases. But I do not think that the government is entirely to be blamed for. I think that scientists worldwide to think if what they are making is dangerous and whether it could bring our world into a more destructible place. Overall I think th at our government need to make and abide laws and our! scientists need to get more commons sense. After all we all live in the selfsame(prenominal) world, shouldn?t everyone be trying to seek to live in a world that is safe for us and our many generations only to come?BibliographyWebsites:Bomb Facts: How Nuclear Weapons are Made. (n.d.). Retrieved October 30, 2008, from http://www.wisconsinproject.org/pubs/articles/2001/bomb%20facts.htm. - skill and act of terrorism. (n.d.). Retrieved October 30, 2008, from http://www.firstscience.com/home/articles/technology/science-and-terrorism_34117.html. :: Total Intelligence Solutions, LLC :: . (n.d.). Retrieved October 30, 2008, from http://www.terrorism.com/. BooksAllison, G. (2005). Nuclear Terrorism: The supreme Preventable Catastrophe. new york: Owl Books. Henshall, I., & Morgan, R. (2005). 9/11 Revealed: The unanswered Questions. New York and Washington D.C.: Da Capo Press. Hoffman, B. (2006). Inside Terrorism. capital of South Carolina: Columbia University Press. If you want to get a full essay, order it on our website: OrderCustomPaper.com

If you want to get a full essay, visit our page: write my paper