Write About The Saudi-qatari Stands On Iraq And What They Agree Or Disagree On?

This will compare and contrast Saudi and Qatari run on Iraq While the positions of the two aforementioned countries have more(prenominal) than in common , there are also more or less substantial divergencys1 ) Saudi ArabiaSaudi Arabia maintains fairly good relations with the coupled States Nevertheless , the country often voices independent opinions some Iraki issue . Saudi leading are fright at the escalating tensions in Iraq that pose a danger to regional security department and prosperity . King Abdullah of Saudi Arabia , at the Arab League top side that took place on 28-30 March 2007 , voiced his concern oer the deepening crisis in Iraq where `blood is spilled between brothers under an illegal foreign occupation and [a] despicable sectarianism that threatens civil warfare (Ismael , 2007Therefore , it is possible to conclude that such a diplomatic intercommunicate was dictated not by hostility towards the get together States , and rather by a deep concern about the state of affairs in the region . Saudi drawing cards are well aware of the fact that a fledged civil war in Iraq will severely expunge all the neighboring countries and result in a big movement of refugees , economic stagnation , and diminished international temper for all the countries in the region . Therefore , the country believes it is serious to inform the United States that they are not entirely quenched with the latest developments in IraqThere is another significant issue to retrieve about Saudi stance on Iraq . Being a predominantly Sunni Muslim nation , Saudis are unhappy with Iran-backed Shiites gaining more and more power in Iraq . Saudi Arabia and Iran share a history of long-lasting rivalry for the position of the regional leader (Byman , 2007 . This is the reason why Saudi Arabia is still reliefive of the American troops staying in Iraq until the situation stabilizes to an acceptable level2 ) QatarLike Saudi Arabia , Qatar is alarmed by the deepening crisis in Iraq .

The Emir of Qatar acknowledges the importance of a prompt resolution of the crisis for the regional stability . The major difference is that the Emir called upon the United Nations to take the leading role in such a resolution , while Saudi Arabia believes that it is the duty of the United States to bring peace and stability to Iraq and voiced their support for Bush s `surge plans . At the General Assembly s 62nd annual ministerial meeting in September 2007 , the Emir of Qatar verbalise that Iraq was too big of a crisis to be considered the responsibility of the United States or the Coalition of the Willing , and this was seen as a admonition of the American policy in the Middle East , contempt the fact that Qatar is an important ally of the United States and hosts one of its largest military machine bases in the region (Al Jazeera , 2007While Qatar maintains close relations with Washington , it was initially opposed to the idea of American intervention and was reluctant to win necessary logistical support to the U .S . army at the initial stages of the operation (BBC , 2002ConclusionConsidering...If you want to get a well(p) essay, order it on our website: Ordercustompaper.com

If you want to get a full essay, wisit our page: write my paper