The nature of this conflict is that in formerly representing the company the plaintiff is suing, the law firm was iniquitous of a conflict of interest. This could have been annuled by the firm if they use their ethical wall and explained to the plaintiff that there was a conflict of interest in this case, and that they could not represent him. In the statutory Information Institute, in Illinois levelheaded Ethics, under rule 1.
6:390 it states that in certain circumstances a lawyer may represent clients whose interest could impact each other. The lawyer must maintain each client and obtain consent. Although in obtaining this consent, it most credibly would reveal significant information as to each client. This rule could have been used in the case I described, to avoid the impact it ultimately had.
Works Cited
Legal Information Institute. Illinois Legal Ethics.
<www.law.cornell.edu/ethics/il/narr/IL>
LexisNexis Academic
<itt-tech.edu/hottopics/Inacademic>If you want to collar a full essay, order it on our website: Ordercustompaper.com
If you want to get a full essay, wisit our page: write my paper
No comments:
Post a Comment