Political Islam Essay

The constant misery of Hesperian sandwich secular ideologies to lay d take in a resolve for the problems facing bounty has given birth to the political side of Islam. Since its inception in to the world, western principles have done nonhing but abuse and brutalize Islamic doctrines, traditions, values, and culture. To add more insult to injury, western ideologies have implanted a fake sound of progress to Islam in its failure to pick up the scotch conditions of Islamic societies and nations. Given the extra-religious motivations, political Islam or more ideally cognise as Islamic fundamentalism is fueled by a multitude of concerns that infect Islam in numerous ways possible.In invest to expound the symptoms that survive to the foundations of Islamic political theory, John Esposito lists down and discusses varying fabrics for much(prenominal) phenomenon. He first explains the failure brought about by the secular philosophies justifies Islams authenticity as an alternati ve form of political theory in governments and societies. Esposito simply suggests that the Muslims cannot be blamed if ever they result to allegedly unorthodox ways to subsidise because the only choice left for them is to look for another non-corruptive option to uplift their worsening economic, cultural, and moral breakdown (Eposito, 2000).Esposito similarly contends that the percentage of armed forces such as the Taliban in Afghanistan have made a vital role in setting the course for Islamic fundamentalisms resurgence (Eposito, 2000). The resurfacing of Islam in a more extreme manner has its root cause in other angles apart from the contributions of various militia forces. Primarily, the rise and dominance of Judeo-Christian traditions in various sects around the world is a plausible angle, this is because Judaism and Christianity have particular doctrines which are at odds with Islam. Though they do not attack places of worship, Muslims still violate Christian and Jewish laws through their topic behavior.John Esposito (2000) implies that Islam or Islamic Fundamentalism for that matter is a case of nicety collision between two different civilizations. He furthers that the rising act upon of religion in international affairs contributes to the conflicts of civilizations. In this particular argument, Esposito attempts to extrapolate the role of religion in other endeavors, but religion has its own interests to operate. In Islams case, how can its adherents postulate a world order if the doctrines that highly influence their ways of life are incoherent?The shock of civilizations theory is just as the same as clash of interests. If a person does not concur with the concept of a particular ideology it is his or her prerogative to disagree and not conform to it. Espositos framework in this sense is as simple as the United States refusal to shroud the concept of communism and the Soviet cause during the 1950s. Osama bin Laden for instance, expresses a g reat deal of resentment over the United States and its ideologies, thats how he justifies his acts of terrorism in various cities and countries, but if he wants to claim Islam as the world order, he is then misguided by his alleged advocacies that would drive home the world.Democracys main concept is freedom majority rule refuses to be shackled by laws that hinder progress. Religion meanwhile has its own foundations found on what is morally right and morally wrong. It is quite considerable how Esposito gives a non-biased discussion of whether there is conflict of interest between Islam and democracy. He concludes that government activity is more influential here and not religion, and that failure to support civil society as well as failure to participate in political affairs strengthens religious and secular authoritarianism (Esposito 2000).It is plausible to presuppose that there can be a mediating factor between Islam and democracy this is due to the fact that both ideologies have a similar cause, which is to pursue the best interests of the people. It is quite true that Islam and its conformists are on the receiving end of western immoralities however, it is a persons own will whether to conform to what plastered aspects of western ideologies imply. Furthermore, although Islam and democracy may have some overlapping and unconnected principles, a certain application of mutual respect is possible to satiate all angles in conflict.In Light of John Espositos member regarding the resurrection of the Islamic resentment over western secular ideologies, a physique of questions are raised to address the matter How is terrorism justified as a counter-measure against the perceived immoral and corruptive nature of western thought? In what context and up to what extent does evil apply in western ideologies? If Mohammed were alive today, would he be having a similar resolution to the nature of western views as modern political Islam conformists do? Do the Polit ical Islamists simply advocate for the upholding of Islams tenets or do they also thirst for global power in other aspects such political and economic? If Islam in itself postulates a diversity of beliefs, how can Islamic fundamentalists take their very core ideas in to the world?