American criminal justice system

The media frenzy continued all(prenominal) week, reaching a crescendo during the bizarre "low-speed" chase on Friday, June 17. That pursuit finally ended at Simpson's house, where the television personality and former football star surrendered to police.

The evidence against Simpson was overwhelming. Police tack together his blood at the scene, and found the victims' blood in his simple machine and at his house (Moldea, pp. 61-178). Simpson countered by hiring two of the best-known attorneys in the city, Robert Shapiro and Johnnie Cochran, and they in turn hired an array of other lawyers and able witnesses. The defense made it known from the outset that they planned to institutionalise the Los Angeles Police Department (LAPD) on trial. The defense alleged that a racist detective had framed Simpson and that the department had so mess up the evidence as to implicate Simpson (Excerpts, A27).

By the time the event went to trial in January of 1995, the public had already been inundated with nonstop flight media coverage and gavel-to-gavel television broadcasts of every legal proceeding involving the encase. conclusion a gore that had heard nothing about the case was impossible. Moreover, money for book rights and exclusive interviews likely awaited the members of the Simpson jury at trial's end, compounding the difficulty of seating a panel.

A jury was finally impaneled (then sequestered) and the trial began, but it moved at a snail's pace. The participants, including the judge, constantly played to the televisi

Lehman, J.G. (1998, July 21). Government property seizures threaten the rights of all. Mackinac Center for Public Policy, www.mackinac.org/article.asp?REL98-06

The unbelief in Robinette was whether the officer, when asking for permission to depend, also must retell the driver that he is free to go. Is it a voluntary search if the driver consents under the mistaken impression that he has no choice? The Court said yes in an 8-1 decision.

Schmidt, S., and Baker, P. (1998, May 5). McDougal indicted for curb on Whitewater. Washington Post, A1.

Critics of the decision claimed that it was just another warning of the " convolute excuse" at work. Key differences exist, however. Criminals who have victimise third parties rather than their abuser often use abuse excuses. Here, the Battered Woman's Syndrome can only be offered into evidence when a woman is charged with killing or harming her spouse or boyfriend.

Much like Bennis, United States v. Ursery is another forfeiture case. foreign Bennis, nobody was innocent. The issue in Ursery was simple: Can the political relation impose both criminal and civil (asset forfeiture) penalties for the same execration without violating the Constitutional prohibition on double jeopardy? The arrogant Court said yes.

This ruling is troubling because of the Court's confusion and because the justices did not adhere to the Court's precedents. Federal courts are supposed to defer to read court interpretations of state laws. Yet here Justice O'Connor rejected the holding of the Montana Supreme Court and arrived at a different interpretation of the statutes in question. For lower courts, this ruling provides wee guidance and runs the risk of creating differential results from state to state.

Ordercustompaper.com is a professional essay writing service at which you can buy essays on any topics and disciplines! All custom essays are written by professional writers!